Guardian wants Government to look at Google News

British newspaper group suggests Google is getting a free ride on its journalism

Barry Collins
31 Mar 2009

The Guardian Media Group has asked the Government to examine Google News and other content aggregators, claiming they contribute nothing to British journalism.

In its written response to the preliminary Digital Britain report, The Guardian argues Google reaps the benefit of content from news sites without contributing anything towards their costs.

"We welcome the interim report's focus on respect for IP and copyright, but believe there is a glaring omission from its examination of such issues: the negative effects of aggregators and search engines on the ability of and incentives for UK content providers to invest in quality content," The Guardian's submission states.

"We think the current market dynamic between content creators and search engines/aggregators is skewed heavily in the latter's favour. This is not conducive to a healthy environment for content creation in the online world."

The newspaper group argues that traffic generated by search engines doesn't compensate for the cost involved in producing content: "The argument has traditionally been that search engines and aggregators provide players like guardian.co.uk with traffic in return for the use of our content, and this is enough to make the relationship symbiotic and equal," the submission claims.

"However, there is a vast over-supply in the market of advertising inventory, and yields have come under severe downward pressure. As a result, the value of the traffic generated by search engines and aggregators has reduced significantly."

The Guardian says content providers are faced with a catch-22: they can't afford to withhold content from search engines, yet can't feasibly charge consumers for it either, "not least because of the presence of the BBC and the vast quantities of free content it publishes on bbc.co.uk."

While The Guardian stops short of suggesting Google and others should be forced to pay for content, it does suggest the exploration of new models that "require fair acknowledgement of the value that our content creates, both on our own site (through advertising) and 'at the edges' in the world of search and aggregation."

Top five stories on PC Pro:

1. Linux defiance as TomTom capitulates to Microsoft

2. Security guru: don't surf web with Firefox

3. Conficker caught out at eleventh hour?

4. Honda revs up thought-controlled robots

5. Full HD - not all it's cracked up to be

Read more about: