MSI RX1300Pro-TD256E review

Price when reviewed

With nVidia’s 6200 and 6600 ranges both supporting Shader Model 3, they have, up until now, been alone in the sub-£70 graphics market. The new ATi X1300 series puts pressure on both by offering the potential of decent gaming performance for the same price.

MSI RX1300Pro-TD256E review

Sure enough, the X1300 performed well in our standard Half-Life 2 and Far Cry tests, scoring rates of 34fps and 25fps respectively at 1,280 x 1,024 with 4x AA and 8x AF. Our tougher benchmarks brought the X1300 Pro to its knees, though; F.E.A.R. played at 10fps at the same setting, and even Doom 3, which is nearing its first birthday, scored just 16fps. Anything above 1,280 x 1,024 or medium detail settings will be off limits in current games.

If all you’re looking for is a basic DirectX 9-compatible graphics card, there are cheaper alternatives, but for gamers on an extreme budget the X1300 may be just the ticket. Its closest competitor by price is nVidia’s GeForce 6600 DDR2, which it outperformed in all of our 1,280 x 1,024 tests.

ATi Radeon X1 series

The at-a-glance guide to ATi’s new batch of GPUs

ATi’s highly anticipated range of graphics cards has finally hit the shelves. With cards designed for budgets ranging from £40 to £350, ATi is hoping to cater for every type of gamer. Here, we introduce the technology behind the new GPUs, and on the opposite page we review a top-end retail version of each one.


The Radeon X1 series (our unofficial group name for the X1300, X1600 and X1800 ranges) is ATi’s first range of cards with no support at all for AGP, so if you’re a die-hard ATi fan with an AGP motherboard you’ll have to say goodbye to it. Each card is based on a brand-new processor: the X1300 on the RV515, the X1600 on the RV530, and the X1800 on the R520.

Some key architectural features are consistent across the whole range of X1 cards, regardless of which chip is used for processing. All the GPUs are fabricated on a 90nm process, which means lower heat, higher efficiency and faster clock speeds. One crucial feature is Shader Model 3 compatibility – although it doesn’t guarantee better visual quality, it does ensure better software performance. It also allows more lights to be rendered per pass (up to four), as well as geometry instancing; that is, drawing a character or object once and then creating it onscreen multiple times. ATi’s previous generation of cards was only compatible with Shader Model 2.


This is the baby of the group, costing between £40 and £70 and the only card in the new line-up to support HyperMemory, ATi’s method of borrowing system RAM to augment onboard graphics memory. With just a pair of vertex shaders and four pixel pipelines, the latest games are a challenge too far. Half-Life 2 at 1,280 x 1,024 with no anti-aliasing or anisotropic filtering will be fine, but you can forget High Dynamic Range (HDR) rendering, as well as brand-new releases such as F.E.A.R..

There are three X1300 variants: the X1300 HyperMemory, the standard X1300, and the X1300 Pro, which boasts a 600MHz clock speed compared to the 450MHz of the other two. Memory clock speeds are set at 500MHz, 250MHz and 400MHz respectively, with the extra speed of the HyperMemory variant needed to shuffle data between the system RAM and the graphics card.


The X1600 is a step up. Priced in the £90 to £110 range, these cards will appeal to anyone more serious about gaming. It can handle this season’s latest crop of games (although not at higher resolutions or the best detail settings), thanks to 12 pixel pipelines. There are two variations: the X1600 Pro and the X1600 XT. Both cards share the same memory and processor architecture, but differ in frequency. The Pro has a core clock of 500MHz and a memory clock of 390MHz, compared to the XT’s faster speeds of 590MHz and 690MHz respectively.

Disclaimer: Some pages on this site may include an affiliate link. This does not effect our editorial in any way.

Todays Highlights
How to See Google Search History
how to download photos from google photos