That display manages acceptable colour reproduction, and has a glossy finish that boosts contrast and adds punch to graphics and images. That means, inevitably, that it isn’t a great laptop for work – the reflections will be far too distracting – and brightness is a little on the low side too. That’s a shame, as the keyboard is definitely good enough. It’s spacious and feels pleasant under the finger, the layout is sensible and the spacing between keys is tight enough that dirt between the keys shouldn’t be too much of a problem. Excel enthusiasts will be happy to find there’s still enough room for numberpad to its right.
And, helped by the lack of dedicated graphics and low voltage CPU, good battery life makes the G72 solid on the road. We’re used to seeing desktop replacements of this size survive less than three hours, but this HP is different, clocking up just over five hours in our light-use battery test, and 1hr 30mins under intensive conditions.
The remainder of what’s on offer is largely par for the course. There are three USB 2 sockets, HDMI and D-SUB video outputs, a card reader (supporting SD, MMC and MS formats) and a DVD writer. As for data connectivity, there are no glaring omissions either, with single-band 802.11n Wi-Fi and Bluetooth and a Gigabit Ethernet port. The 500GB hard drive is large enough for a good-sized media collection and plenty of heavyweight installations.
In fact, the only major problem we have with the G72 was with its touchpad. We noticed a lag in responsiveness when using it and, as the touchpad melts seamlessly into the surrounding chassis, the textured surface may not be to everyone’s taste. Also frustrating is the rocker-style button which feels stiff and demands a considerable amount of pressure to click.
The HP G72 has much to recommend it, though. It manages to offer what few budget desktop replacements can: decent performance and a good range of features, coupled with a stylish exterior, generous screen size and surprising battery life. At £447 exc VAT, it’s good value too, so it’s hard to let a few minor flaws put us off a recommendation. It’s a good desktop replacement for anyone on a tight budget.
Physical specifications | |
---|---|
Dimensions | 412 x 269 x 32.4mm (WDH) |
Weight | 2.880kg |
Travelling weight | 3.3kg |
Processor and memory | |
Processor | Intel Core i3-350 |
RAM capacity | 4.00GB |
Memory type | DDR3 |
Screen and video | |
Screen size | 17.3in |
Resolution screen horizontal | 1,600 |
Resolution screen vertical | 900 |
Resolution | 1600 x 900 |
Graphics chipset | Intel HD graphics |
VGA (D-SUB) outputs | 1 |
HDMI outputs | 1 |
S-Video outputs | 0 |
DVI-I outputs | 0 |
DVI-D outputs | 0 |
DisplayPort outputs | 0 |
Drives | |
Capacity | 500GB |
Hard disk | Seagate ST9500325AS |
Optical disc technology | DVD writer |
Optical drive | HP |
Replacement battery price inc VAT | £0 |
Networking | |
802.11a support | no |
802.11b support | yes |
802.11g support | yes |
802.11 draft-n support | yes |
Integrated 3G adapter | no |
Bluetooth support | yes |
Other Features | |
Wireless hardware on/off switch | no |
Wireless key-combination switch | yes |
USB ports (downstream) | 3 |
3.5mm audio jacks | 2 |
SD card reader | yes |
MMC (multimedia card) reader | yes |
Pointing device type | Touchpad |
Audio chipset | Realtek HD Audio |
Speaker location | Above keyboard/Front edge |
Hardware volume control? | no |
Integrated microphone? | yes |
Integrated webcam? | yes |
Camera megapixel rating | 1.3mp |
Fingerprint reader | no |
Battery and performance tests | |
Battery life, light use | 5hr 6min |
Battery life, heavy use | 1hr 30min |
Overall application benchmark score | 1.30 |
Office application benchmark score | 1.02 |
2D graphics application benchmark score | 1.34 |
Encoding application benchmark score | 1.42 |
Multitasking application benchmark score | 1.46 |
3D performance (crysis) low settings | 13fps |
Operating system and software | |
Operating system | Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit |
OS family | Windows 7 |
Disclaimer: Some pages on this site may include an affiliate link. This does not effect our editorial in any way.